From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fashing v. Moore

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.[fn*] Unit A
Oct 21, 1982
689 F.2d 593 (5th Cir. 1982)

Opinion

No. 80-1107.

October 21, 1982.

James P. Allison, Asst. Atty. Gen., Austin, Tex., for defendants-appellants.

Austen H. Furse, Austin, Tex., for amicus curiae William N. Patman.

Raymond C. Caballero, El Paso, Tex., for plaintiffs-appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, Harry Lee Hudspeth, Judge.

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before GEE, RANDALL and TATE, Circuit Judges.



This court, 631 F.2d 731, affirmed the judgment of the District Court for the Western District of Texas, 489 F. Supp. 471, holding that Art. III, § 19 and Art. XVI, § 65 of the Texas Constitution denied plaintiffs-appellees the equal protection of the laws in violation of the United States Constitution. The Supreme Court, ___ U.S. ___, 102 S.Ct. 2836, 73 L.Ed.2d 508 reversed the judgment of this court with costs and remanded the case to us "for further proceedings in conformity with the opinion of this Court." We hereby remand this case to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of the Supreme Court.

REMANDED.


Summaries of

Fashing v. Moore

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.[fn*] Unit A
Oct 21, 1982
689 F.2d 593 (5th Cir. 1982)
Case details for

Fashing v. Moore

Case Details

Full title:JOHN L. FASHING, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES, v. JUDGE T. UDELL MOORE, ET…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.[fn*] Unit A

Date published: Oct 21, 1982

Citations

689 F.2d 593 (5th Cir. 1982)

Citing Cases

State v. Passante

When evaluating the constitutional validity of a statute under both the United States and New Jersey…