From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Farthing v. State

United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio
Mar 2, 2022
1:21cv789 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 2, 2022)

Opinion

1:21cv789

03-02-2022

Robert C. Farthing, Plaintiff, v. Stale. Defendant.


ORDER

Susan J. Dlott Judge United States District Court

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman filed on January 20, 2022 (Doe. 4). to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b). and noting that no objections have been Hied thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b) expired February 3. 2022, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations.

Accordingly, plaintiffs complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 191 5(a)(3) that an appeal of this Order would not be taken in good faith an denies plaintiff leave to appeal in forma pauperis.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 1


Summaries of

Farthing v. State

United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio
Mar 2, 2022
1:21cv789 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 2, 2022)
Case details for

Farthing v. State

Case Details

Full title:Robert C. Farthing, Plaintiff, v. Stale. Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio

Date published: Mar 2, 2022

Citations

1:21cv789 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 2, 2022)