From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Farsian v. Pfizer, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Oct 16, 1996
97 F.3d 508 (11th Cir. 1996)

Opinion

No. 94-6117.

Decided October 16, 1996.

James W. Gewin, Bradley Arant Rose White, Birmingham, AL, David Klingsberg, Kaye, Scholer, Fierman, Hays Handler, New York City, Sid Trant, Bradley, Arant, Rose White, Birmingham, AL, for Plaintiff-Respondent.

Roger L. Lucas, Lucas, Alvis, Kirby Wahs, Elizabeth R. Jones, Birmingham, AL, for Defendants-Petitioners.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama (No. CV 92-G-2646-S); J. Foy Guin, Jr., Judge.

Before HATCHETT, Chief Judge, COX, Circuit Judge, and JOHNSON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Judge Johnson was a member of the panel that heard oral argument in this case, but did not participate in this decision. This decision is rendered by quorum. 28 U.S.C. §(s) 46(d).


We permitted an interlocutory appeal in this case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §(s) 1292(b) to review the propriety of the district court's denial of the defendants' motion for summary judgment. We concluded that the appeal involved a question of Alabama law that was determinative and unanswered by controlling precedent in Alabama. Farsian v. Pfizer, Inc., 52 F.3d 932 (11th Cir. 1995). We certified the following question to the Supreme Court of Alabama:

DOES A HEART VALVE IMPLANTEE HAVE A VALID CAUSE OF ACTION FOR FRAUD UNDER ALABAMA LAW IF HE ASSERTS THAT THE VALVE'S MANUFACTURER FRAUDULENTLY INDUCED HIM TO HAVE THE VALVE IMPLANTED WHEN THE DAMAGES THAT HE ASSERTS DO NOT INCLUDE AN INJURY — PRODUCING MALFUNCTION OF THE PRODUCT BECAUSE THE VALVE HAS BEEN AND IS WORKING PROPERLY?

Id. at 934. The Supreme Court of Alabama has now answered the question in the negative. Pfizer, Inc. v. Farsian, No. 1941153, ___ So.2d ___ (Ala. Aug. 30, 1996). The judgment of the district court is therefore REVERSED and this action is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim.

REVERSED and RENDERED.


Summaries of

Farsian v. Pfizer, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Oct 16, 1996
97 F.3d 508 (11th Cir. 1996)
Case details for

Farsian v. Pfizer, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Garshasb Hamid FARSIAN, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. PFIZER, INC., Shiley…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit

Date published: Oct 16, 1996

Citations

97 F.3d 508 (11th Cir. 1996)

Citing Cases

Suter v. General Accident Insurance Company of America

Bowling v. Pfizer, Inc., 143 F.R.D. 141, 147 (S.D. Ohio 1992).See Farsian v. Pfizer, Inc., 97 F.3d 508 (11th…

Sadeghi-A v. Daimler Trucks N. Am. LLC

See Briehl v. Gen. Motors Corp., 172 F.3d 623, 628 (8th Cir. 1999) ("In this case, the Plaintiffs have not…