From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Farrington v. Jewish Voice Inc.

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Feb 23, 2022
21-CV-1575 (NGG) (AYS) (E.D.N.Y. Feb. 23, 2022)

Opinion

21-CV-1575 (NGG) (AYS)

02-23-2022

WILLIAM FARRINGTON, Plaintiff, v. JEWISH VOICE INC., Defendant.


MEMORANDUM & ORDER

NICHOLAS G. GARAUFIS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pending before the court is Plaintiff William Farrington's motion for default judgment against Defendant Jewish Voice Inc. Far-rington alleges copyright infringement in violation of the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C §§ 106, 501 and removal or alteration of copyright management information in violation of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. § 1202. (See Mot. for Default J. (Dkt. 11)0 This motion was referred to Magistrate Judge Anne Y. Shields for a report and recommendation ("R&R"). (See Sept. 20, 2021 Order Referring Mot.) Magistrate Judge Shields issued the annexed R&R on February 7, 2022, recommending the court grant Plaintiffs motion. (See R&R (Dkt. 16))

No party has objected to Magistrate Judge Shields's R&R, and the time to do so has passed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). Therefore, the court reviews the R&R for clear error. See Velasquez v. Metro Fuel Oil Corp., 12 F.Supp.3d 387, 397 (E.D.N.Y. 2014). Having found none, the court ADOPTS the R&R in full and awards Plaintiff $6,500 in damages and $400 in costs for the reasons stated in the R&R.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Farrington v. Jewish Voice Inc.

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Feb 23, 2022
21-CV-1575 (NGG) (AYS) (E.D.N.Y. Feb. 23, 2022)
Case details for

Farrington v. Jewish Voice Inc.

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM FARRINGTON, Plaintiff, v. JEWISH VOICE INC., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. New York

Date published: Feb 23, 2022

Citations

21-CV-1575 (NGG) (AYS) (E.D.N.Y. Feb. 23, 2022)

Citing Cases

Martinka v. Yeshiva World News, LLC

Absent evidence of lost revenues, “[a]n award of $1,000 for the Copyright Act violation is in line with…

Karmagreen, LLC v. Super Chill CBD Prods.

,” Castillo v. G & M Realty L.P., 950 F.3d 155, 172 (2d Cir. 2020), Plaintiff has submitted no evidence of…