From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

FARINA v. ZANN

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Nov 3, 1992
609 So. 2d 629 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Opinion

No. 90-3308.

August 26, 1992. Rehearing Denied as Moot November 3, 1992.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Broward County, John T. Luzzo, J.

Nancy Little Hoffman of Nancy Little Hoffman P.A., and Angelo Marino, Jr. of Marino Goodman, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellants.

Karl L. Santone and Vanessa A. Reynolds of Santone Eyler, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellees.


We reverse and agree with appellants that they were entitled to an instruction on the law set out in Stuart v. Hertz Corp., 351 So.2d 703 (Fla. 1977), that a tortfeasor will be held responsible for damages of the victim resulting from negligent medical treatment rendered by reason of the original wrongful act.

The appellants' claim was predicated on allegations that Mrs. Farina's physician, Dr. Gregory J. Zann, was negligent in his diagnosis and treatment. It was claimed that a series of subsequent surgeries and treatments, including the negative consequences thereof, would not have occurred, but for Dr. Zann's earlier negligent diagnosis and treatment. At trial there was proof and argument by the defense that Mrs. Farina's most serious injuries resulted from the actions or inactions of other physicians, rather than the neglect of Dr. Zann. Under these circumstances, the appellants were entitled to an instruction under the law of Stuart. See Davidson v. Gaillard, 584 So.2d 71 (Fla. 1st DCA), rev. denied, 591 So.2d 181, 591 So.2d 182 (Fla. 1991).

We reject the argument that the error was rendered harmless by application of the two issue rule set out in Colonial Stores, Inc. v. Scarbrough, 355 So.2d 1181 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977), approved 381 So.2d 1355 (Fla. 1980). See LoBue v. Travelers Ins. Co., 388 So.2d 1349 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980), rev. denied, 397 So.2d 777 (Fla. 1981).

We find no reversible error in the other issues raised. Accordingly, we reverse and remand with directions for a new trial and other proceedings in accord herewith.

GLICKSTEIN, C.J., ANSTEAD, J., and HOY, JOHN J., Associate Judge, concur.


Summaries of

FARINA v. ZANN

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Nov 3, 1992
609 So. 2d 629 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)
Case details for

FARINA v. ZANN

Case Details

Full title:DIANE FARINA AND JOHN FARINA, APPELLANTS, v. GREGORY J. ZANN, M.D., AND…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Nov 3, 1992

Citations

609 So. 2d 629 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Citing Cases

Haas v. Zaccaria

In the instant case, with the timely presentation of all the evidence, a jury could have concluded, as…

Charlemagne v. Francis

In the instant case, the two-issue rule is inapplicable because the appellant claimed only one theory of…