From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Farber v. Broadco Holding Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 23, 1939
256 App. Div. 833 (N.Y. App. Div. 1939)

Opinion

January 23, 1939.


Order denying, conditionally, defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to prosecute reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, without costs. The delay of well over two years after joinder of issue, during which time the cause of action was not noticed for trial, with no reasonable excuse offered for the delay, requires dismissal. Lazansky, P.J., Hagarty, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Farber v. Broadco Holding Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 23, 1939
256 App. Div. 833 (N.Y. App. Div. 1939)
Case details for

Farber v. Broadco Holding Corporation

Case Details

Full title:FRANCES FARBER, Respondent, v. BROADCO HOLDING CORPORATION, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 23, 1939

Citations

256 App. Div. 833 (N.Y. App. Div. 1939)

Citing Cases

Vitale v. Bartlucci

( Gabrielsen v. Brookhattan Trucking Co., 250 App. Div. 861.) A long delay after joinder of issue with no…

Rosenberg v. Pubnico Realty Corporation

Order granting motion to dismiss an action for failure to prosecute modified by striking therefrom the words…