From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fann v. State Highway Department

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Jun 15, 1931
160 S.C. 156 (S.C. 1931)

Opinion

June 15, 1931.


ORDER

The appeal in this case was not perfected within the time required by the rules of this Court and by the statutes of the State. The motion of the respondent to dismiss the same was granted by the Circuit Judge. The appellant then sought before this Court permission to perfect the appeal.

On consideration of the grounds for the motion, it appears that the appellant did not comply with the rules and holdings of the Court as announced in the case of Wade v. Gore, 154 S.C. 262, 151 S.E., 470, in that no effort was made to secure from the trial Judge or from a member of this Court an extension of time for perfecting the appeal. Because of this negligence on the part of the appellant, a motion to reinstate the appeal is refused. The Court wishes to reaffirm what we said in Wade v. Gore, supra.

EUGENE S. BLEASE,

Chief Justice.

Columbia, S.C.

June 15, 1931.


Summaries of

Fann v. State Highway Department

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Jun 15, 1931
160 S.C. 156 (S.C. 1931)
Case details for

Fann v. State Highway Department

Case Details

Full title:FANN, BY GUARDIAN v. STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT

Court:Supreme Court of South Carolina

Date published: Jun 15, 1931

Citations

160 S.C. 156 (S.C. 1931)
159 S.E. 617

Citing Cases

State v. Patterson et al

of the filing of this order with the Clerk of Court for McCormick County. Mr. Joseph Murray, of Columbia, for…

State v. Cottingham et al

Rylee v. Marett, supra, 121 S.C. 366, 113 S.E. 483, and earlier cases there cited. Wade v. Gore, 154 S.C.…