From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Falgout v. Trujillo

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Jul 5, 1967
380 F.2d 376 (10th Cir. 1967)

Opinion

No. 9288.

July 5, 1967.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Colorado; Alfred A. Arraj, Judge.

Albert B. Dawkins, Denver, Colo., for appellant.

Bert M. Keating, Theodore A. Borrillo and Thomas May, Denver, Colo., for appellees.

Before LEWIS, HILL and HICKEY, Circuit Judges.


Appellant, confined as a prisoner of the State of Colorado, filed his petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado, raising the question of violation of his Constitutional rights. An able attorney was appointed to represent him there, an evidentiary hearing was had before Chief Judge Arraj and in a memorandum opinion the writ was denied. We have carefully reviewed the entire record and the denial is affirmed on the basis of, and for the reasons stated in, the opinion of the trial judge, reported in 270 F. Supp. 685, D.C.


Summaries of

Falgout v. Trujillo

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Jul 5, 1967
380 F.2d 376 (10th Cir. 1967)
Case details for

Falgout v. Trujillo

Case Details

Full title:Frank Louis FALGOUT, Appellant, v. Mose TRUJILLO, Sheriff of the City and…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit

Date published: Jul 5, 1967

Citations

380 F.2d 376 (10th Cir. 1967)

Citing Cases

Valdez v. People

Further, defendant's motion does not set forth any facts showing that the delay was in any manner oppressive…

Mattox v. Carson

The existence of a "judgment" is not a vital ingredient for Federal habeas jurisdiction. See Falgout v.…