From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fajack v. Cleveland Graphite Bronze Co.

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, E.D
Jul 23, 1947
73 F. Supp. 308 (N.D. Ohio 1947)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 24490.

July 23, 1947.

Edward Lamb, of Toledo, Ohio, for plaintiff.

Smith, Bellamy, Dill Hopkins, of Cleveland, Ohio, for defendant.


Action under the Portal-to-Portal Act of 1947 by John M. Fajack and others against the Cleveland Graphite Bronze Company.

Complaints dismissed without prejudice.


The basis for the liability sought to be imposed in this case as laid does not conform to the requirements of the so-called Portal-to-Portal Act of 1947, approved May 14, 1947, 29 U.S.C.A. § 251 et seq. The complaint, therefore, will be dismissed without prejudice.

If the plaintiffs are able to bring an action alleging essential facts respecting unpaid overtime and for valid compensable time as is required by the new Act, the opportunity is not foreclosed.

If, as is suggested, the constitutionality of the statute is to be put in issue it would be far better to have such challenge incorporated in a new complaint.

Amendment or supplement to the complaint was suggested but complications in pleading are apprehended in an attempt to re-form pleadings in pending actions, particularly where a new statute imposing conditions has intervened.


Summaries of

Fajack v. Cleveland Graphite Bronze Co.

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, E.D
Jul 23, 1947
73 F. Supp. 308 (N.D. Ohio 1947)
Case details for

Fajack v. Cleveland Graphite Bronze Co.

Case Details

Full title:FAJACK et al. v. CLEVELAND GRAPHITE BRONZE CO

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, E.D

Date published: Jul 23, 1947

Citations

73 F. Supp. 308 (N.D. Ohio 1947)

Citing Cases

Smith v. Cudahy Packing Co.

Lauf v. E.G. Shinner Co., 303 U.S. 323, 58 S.Ct. 578, 82 L.Ed. 872; Burfeind v. Eagle-Picher Co., supra;…

Seese v. Bethlehem Steel Co.

I am also referred to a large number of similar cases in other districts in which motions to dismiss…