From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Faires v. State Bd. of Elections

SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA
May 6, 2016
368 N.C. 825 (N.C. 2016)

Summary

affirming on this basis the judgment of a three-judge panel of the Superior Court, Wake County

Summary of this case from Sykes v. Health Network Sols., Inc.

Opinion

No. 84A16.

05-06-2016

Sabra FAIRES, Bennett Little Cotten, and Diane P. Lahti v. STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS ; A. Grant Whitney, Jr., Chair, and Rhonda K. Amoroso, Joshua D. Malcolm, Maja Kricker, and James L. Baker, members of the State Board, in their official capacities only; and Kim Westbrook Strach, Executive Director of the State Board, in her official capacity only.

Tharrington Smith, LLP, Raleigh, by Michael Crowell, Deborah Stagner, Stephen Rawson, and Neal Ramee, for plaintiff-appellees. Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by John F. Maddrey, Solicitor General; Elizabeth A. Fisher, Assistant Solicitor General; Alexander McC. Peters, Senior Deputy Attorney General; and Melissa L. Trippe, Special Deputy Attorney General, for defendant-appellants. Graebe, Hanna & Sullivan PLLC, Raleigh, by Mark R. Sigmon ; American Civil Liberties Union of North Carolina Legal Foundation, by Christopher Brook, Raleigh and Jenifer Wolfe; and Civitas Institute, Center for Law and Freedom, by Elliot Engstrom, for American Civil Liberties Union of North Carolina Legal Foundation and Civitas Institute, Center for Law and Freedom, amici curiae. John V. Orth, pro se, amicus curiae.


Tharrington Smith, LLP, Raleigh, by Michael Crowell, Deborah Stagner, Stephen Rawson, and Neal Ramee, for plaintiff-appellees.

Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by John F. Maddrey, Solicitor General; Elizabeth A. Fisher, Assistant Solicitor General; Alexander McC. Peters, Senior Deputy Attorney General; and Melissa L. Trippe, Special Deputy Attorney General, for defendant-appellants.

Graebe, Hanna & Sullivan PLLC, Raleigh, by Mark R. Sigmon ; American Civil Liberties Union of North Carolina Legal Foundation, by Christopher Brook, Raleigh and Jenifer Wolfe; and Civitas Institute, Center for Law and Freedom, by Elliot Engstrom, for American Civil Liberties Union of North Carolina Legal Foundation and Civitas Institute, Center for Law and Freedom, amici curiae.

John V. Orth, pro se, amicus curiae.

PER CURIAM.

Justice EDMUNDS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the judgment of the three-judge panel of the Superior Court, Wake County. Accordingly, the judgment of the three-judge panel of the Superior Court, Wake County is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See, e.g., State v. Long, 365 N.C. 5, 705 S.E.2d 735 (2011) (per curiam); State v. Greene, 298 N.C. 268, 258 S.E.2d 71 (1979) (per curiam).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Faires v. State Bd. of Elections

SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA
May 6, 2016
368 N.C. 825 (N.C. 2016)

affirming on this basis the judgment of a three-judge panel of the Superior Court, Wake County

Summary of this case from Sykes v. Health Network Sols., Inc.
Case details for

Faires v. State Bd. of Elections

Case Details

Full title:SABRA FAIRES, BENNETT LITTLE COTTEN, and DIANE P. LAHTI v. STATE BOARD OF…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA

Date published: May 6, 2016

Citations

368 N.C. 825 (N.C. 2016)
784 S.E.2d 463

Citing Cases

Sykes v. Health Network Sols., Inc.

As to plaintiffs’ antitrust claims, the members of the Court are equally divided; accordingly, the decision…

Harper v. Hall

Simply put, any attempt to determine the effect of the 8 December 2021 order upon the outcome of this year's…