From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fabrizio, Radmin, Buskbaum v. Hendler, Murray

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 26, 1995
216 A.D.2d 520 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

June 26, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Molloy, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, with costs, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Nassau County, for a hearing to determine whether the plaintiff obtained personal jurisdiction over all of the defendants.

There are numerous issues of fact regarding service of process upon the defendants in this case. Thus, the Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion by failing to order a hearing to determine whether the plaintiff had obtained personal jurisdiction over all of the defendants (see, De Vore v Osborne, 78 A.D.2d 915). Thompson, J.P., Pizzuto, Santucci and Florio, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Fabrizio, Radmin, Buskbaum v. Hendler, Murray

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 26, 1995
216 A.D.2d 520 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Fabrizio, Radmin, Buskbaum v. Hendler, Murray

Case Details

Full title:FABRIZIO, RADMIN, BUSKBAUM COMPANY, Respondent, v. HENDLER MURRAY, P.C.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 26, 1995

Citations

216 A.D.2d 520 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
628 N.Y.S.2d 584

Citing Cases

Thomas v. Maloney

Thus, the question of whether the complaint insofar as asserted against Maloney should be dismissed for lack…

Spencer Condominium v. Hazan

The validity of service pursuant to CPLR 308(4) is to be established through a hearing when, as here, there…