From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

F.A. Bartlett Tree Expert Co. v. Katz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 18, 1998
250 A.D.2d 726 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

May 18, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Kutner, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The court properly denied, without a hearing, the plaintiff's motion to preliminarily enjoin the defendants, the plaintiff's former employee and his new employer, from, inter alia, pursuing their business of caring for trees and shrubs anywhere in Nassau County for two years after the plaintiff had terminated the employment of the defendant Richard P. Katz. The plaintiff failed to meet its burden of showing the likelihood of success on the merits, any irreparable harm absent injunctive relief, and that the equities were balanced in its favor ( see, e.g., Skaggs-Walsh, Inc. v. Chmiel, 224 A.D.2d 680; Hudson Val. Propane Corp. v. Byrne, 24 A.D.2d 908; Abdallah v. Crandall, 273 App. Div. 131; see also, CPLR 6312).

Sullivan, J.P., Pizzuto, Altman and Friedmann, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

F.A. Bartlett Tree Expert Co. v. Katz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 18, 1998
250 A.D.2d 726 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

F.A. Bartlett Tree Expert Co. v. Katz

Case Details

Full title:F.A. BARTLETT TREE EXPERT CO., Appellant, v. RICHARD P. KATZ et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 18, 1998

Citations

250 A.D.2d 726 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
672 N.Y.S.2d 775

Citing Cases

Rescomcleaning, Inc. v. Ulloa

Furthermore, plaintiff has failed to provide information as to its total number of customers during the years…

Khan v. State University of New York Health Science Center at Brooklyn

Ordered that the order is reversed, with costs, and the motion is denied. It is well settled that a…