From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

F. N. B. of Omaha v. Marquette N. B. of Minneapolis

U.S.
Apr 6, 1981
450 U.S. 1042 (1981)

Summary

holding that a violation of plaintiff's bank's rights under the National Banking Act did not give rise to a § 1983 cause of action

Summary of this case from Premachandra v. Mitts

Opinion

No. 80-1391.

April 6, 1981, OCTOBER TERM, 1980.


C.A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 636 F. 2d 195.


Summaries of

F. N. B. of Omaha v. Marquette N. B. of Minneapolis

U.S.
Apr 6, 1981
450 U.S. 1042 (1981)

holding that a violation of plaintiff's bank's rights under the National Banking Act did not give rise to a § 1983 cause of action

Summary of this case from Premachandra v. Mitts

holding § 1983 action limited to claims "in the nature of the rights protected by the Civil Rights Act," including "fundamental human, highly personalized rights. . . ."

Summary of this case from New York Airlines, Inc. v. Dukes County

finding that the institution of a single lawsuit does not give rise to a cause of action under the antitrust laws absent allegations that the lawsuit involves ethical misconduct similar to the abuses described in California Motor Transport

Summary of this case from Hydro-Tech Corp. v. Sundstrand Corp.
Case details for

F. N. B. of Omaha v. Marquette N. B. of Minneapolis

Case Details

Full title:FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF OMAHA ET AL. v. MARQUETTE NATIONAL BANK OF…

Court:U.S.

Date published: Apr 6, 1981

Citations

450 U.S. 1042 (1981)

Citing Cases

Blitz v. Town of New Castle

Certain incentive density bonuses allow increases of up to 20% of the basic permitted density if the…

Hufsmith v. Weaver

The defendants responded by agreeing with Razorback that the district court should retain jurisdiction, but…