explaining why Canadian bankruptcy proceedings should be recognized, and deferred to, based on the doctrine of comity
Summary of this case from Brenton v. Consolidated Rail Corporation79-7392.
November 2, 1979.
S.D.N.Y., 430 F.Supp. 988.
AFFIRMED.
explaining why Canadian bankruptcy proceedings should be recognized, and deferred to, based on the doctrine of comity
Summary of this case from Brenton v. Consolidated Rail CorporationFull title:F. M. Schaefer Corp. v. Electronic Data Systems, Corp
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Date published: Nov 2, 1979
The parties do not dispute plaintiff had a constitutionally protected right to continued employment as a…
Daniels v. PowellClarkson Co., Ltd. v. Shaheen, 544 F.2d 624, 630 (2d Cir. 1976). Cornfeld v. Investors Overseas Services,…