From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Excel Communications, Inc. v. AT&T Corp

U.S.
Oct 12, 1999
528 U.S. 946 (1999)

Summary

noting that the Perry rule has been consistently applied

Summary of this case from Frazier v. Bobby

Opinion

No. 99-95.

October 12, 1999, OCTOBER TERM, 1999.


C.A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied. JUSTICE O'CONNOR took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition. Reported below: 172 F. 3d 1352.

Statement of JUSTICE STEVENS respecting the denial of the petition for writ of certiorari.

The importance of the question presented in this certiorari petition makes it appropriate to reiterate the fact that the denial of the petition does not constitute a ruling on the merits. See Carpenter v. Gomez, 516 U. S. 981 (1995) (opinion of STEVENS, J., respecting denial of certiorari); Maryland v. Baltimore Radio Show, Inc., 338 U. S. 912, 917-919 (1950) (opinion of Frankfurter, J., respecting denial of certiorari).


Summaries of

Excel Communications, Inc. v. AT&T Corp

U.S.
Oct 12, 1999
528 U.S. 946 (1999)

noting that the Perry rule has been consistently applied

Summary of this case from Frazier v. Bobby

noting that the Perry rule has been consistently applied

Summary of this case from Noling v. Bradshaw

noting that the Perry rule has been consistently applied

Summary of this case from ELEY v. BAGLEY

noting that the Perry rule has been consistently applied

Summary of this case from Dickerson v. Mitchell

noting that the Perry rule has been consistently applied

Summary of this case from Davie v. Mitchell
Case details for

Excel Communications, Inc. v. AT&T Corp

Case Details

Full title:EXCEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. ET AL. v. ATT CORP

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 12, 1999

Citations

528 U.S. 946 (1999)

Citing Cases

Noling v. Bradshaw

Buell v. Mitchell, 274 F.3d 337, 349 (6th Cir. 2001) ("This court has held that [the Perry rule] is regularly…

HILL v. AMIR

In general under federal law, "the time of accrual [is] that point in time when the plaintiff knows or has…