From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Exadaktilos v. Cinnaminson Realty Co., Inc.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
May 2, 1980
173 N.J. Super. 559 (App. Div. 1980)

Opinion

Submitted April 28, 1980 —

Decided May 2, 1980.

Before Judges SEIDMAN, MICHELS and DEVINE.

On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Burlington County, whose opinion is reported at 167 N.J. Super. 141.

Bookbinder, Colaguori Bookbinder, attorneys for defendants-appellants and cross-respondents ( Louis A. Colaguori, of counsel and on the brief).

Normal Shabel, attorney for plaintiff-respondent and cross-appellant.


The judgment of the Law Division is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Haines in his written opinion which is reported in Exadaktilos v. Cinnaminson Realty Co., Inc., 167 N.J. Super. 141 , 400 A.2d 554 (Law Div. 1979).


Summaries of

Exadaktilos v. Cinnaminson Realty Co., Inc.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
May 2, 1980
173 N.J. Super. 559 (App. Div. 1980)
Case details for

Exadaktilos v. Cinnaminson Realty Co., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:LEONIDAS EXADAKTILOS, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT AND CROSS-APPELLANT, v…

Court:Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division

Date published: May 2, 1980

Citations

173 N.J. Super. 559 (App. Div. 1980)
414 A.2d 994

Citing Cases

Grato v. Grato

Absent such a showing, the judiciary should not disturb or second-guess corporate action, because the…

Gimpel v. Bolstein

For a collection of such statutes, see the opinion of Mr. Justice Ryp in Topper v Park Sheraton Pharmacy (…