From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nonhuman Rights Project, Inc. ex rel. Happy v. Breheny

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Dec 17, 2020
189 A.D.3d 583 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)

Opinion

12680 Index No. 260441/19 Case No. 2020-02581

12-17-2020

In re NONHUMAN RIGHTS PROJECT, INC., on Behalf of Happy, Petitioner–Appellant, v. James J. BREHENY, etc., et al., Respondents–Respondents. Protect the Harvest and Alliance of Marine Mammal Parks & Aquariums, Professor Richard L. Cupp, Jr., Gary Comstock, Ph.D., G.K.D. Crozier, Ph.D., Andrew Fenton, Ph.D., Tyler John, L. Syd M. Johnson Ph.D., Robert C. Jones, Ph.D., Letitia Meynell, Ph.D. Nathan Nobis, Ph.D., David Pen~a–Guzma´n, Ph.D., James Rocha, Ph.D., Bernard Rollin, Ph.D., Jeff Sebo, Ph.D., Justin Marceau, Samuel Wiseman and Professor Laurence H. Tribe, Amici Curiae.

Elizabeth Stein, New Hyde Park, and Steven M. Wise, Carol Springs, FL of the bar of the State of Massachusetts, admitted pro hac vice, of counsel, for appellant. Phillips Lytle LLP, Buffalo (Kenneth A. Manning of counsel), for respondents. Kelley Drye & Warren, LLP, New York (Bezalel A. Stern of counsel), for Protect the Harvest and Alliance of Marine Mammal Parks & Aquariums, amici curiae. Jessica A. Kulpit, Buffalo, for Richard L. Cupp, Jr., amicus curiae. Amy Trakinski, New York, for Gary Comstock, Ph.D., G.K.D. Crozier, Ph.D., Andrew Fenton, Ph.D., Tyler John, L. Syd M. Johnson Ph.D., Robert C. Jones, Ph.D., Letitia Meynell, Ph.D. Nathan Nobis, Ph.D., David Pen~a–Guzma´n, Ph.D., James Rocha, Ph.D., Bernard Rollin, Ph.D., Jeff Sebo, Ph.D., amici curiae. Chaffetz Lindsey LLP, New York (David M. Lindsey of counsel), for Justin Marceau, Samuel Wiseman, amici curiae. Richman Law Group, New York (Jay Shooster of counsel), for Professor Laurence H. Tribe, amicus curiae.


Elizabeth Stein, New Hyde Park, and Steven M. Wise, Carol Springs, FL of the bar of the State of Massachusetts, admitted pro hac vice, of counsel, for appellant.

Phillips Lytle LLP, Buffalo (Kenneth A. Manning of counsel), for respondents.

Kelley Drye & Warren, LLP, New York (Bezalel A. Stern of counsel), for Protect the Harvest and Alliance of Marine Mammal Parks & Aquariums, amici curiae.

Jessica A. Kulpit, Buffalo, for Richard L. Cupp, Jr., amicus curiae.

Amy Trakinski, New York, for Gary Comstock, Ph.D., G.K.D. Crozier, Ph.D., Andrew Fenton, Ph.D., Tyler John, L. Syd M. Johnson Ph.D., Robert C. Jones, Ph.D., Letitia Meynell, Ph.D. Nathan Nobis, Ph.D., David Pen~a–Guzma´n, Ph.D., James Rocha, Ph.D., Bernard Rollin, Ph.D., Jeff Sebo, Ph.D., amici curiae.

Chaffetz Lindsey LLP, New York (David M. Lindsey of counsel), for Justin Marceau, Samuel Wiseman, amici curiae.

Richman Law Group, New York (Jay Shooster of counsel), for Professor Laurence H. Tribe, amicus curiae.

Manzanet–Daniels, J.P., Gesmer, Kern, Oing, Moulton, JJ.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alison Y. Tuitt, J.), entered on or about February 19, 2020, which granted respondents' motion to dismiss the petition for a writ of habeas corpus on behalf of Happy, an elephant, unanimously affirmed, without costs. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment dismissing the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 70.

The common-law writ of habeas corpus does not lie on behalf of Happy, the elephant at issue in this proceeding (see Matter of Nonhuman Rights Project, Inc. v. Lavery, 152 A.D.3d 73, 54 N.Y.S.3d 392 [1st Dept. 2017], lv denied 31 N.Y.3d 1054, 76 N.Y.S.3d 507, 100 N.E.3d 846 [2018] ). We decline to overrule any of our alternative holdings in Lavery , which petitioner erroneously refers to as "dicta." Under Lavery , the writ of habeas corpus is limited to human beings (see id. at 76–78, 54 N.Y.S.3d 392 ). A judicial determination that species other than homo sapiens are "persons" for some juridical purposes, and therefore have certain rights, would lead to a labyrinth of questions that common-law processes are ill-equipped to answer. As we said in Lavery , the decisions of whether and how to integrate other species into legal constructs designed for humans is a matter "better suited to the legislative process." ( id. at 80, 54 N.Y.S.3d 392 ).


Summaries of

Nonhuman Rights Project, Inc. ex rel. Happy v. Breheny

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Dec 17, 2020
189 A.D.3d 583 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
Case details for

Nonhuman Rights Project, Inc. ex rel. Happy v. Breheny

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Nonhuman Rights Project, Inc., on Behalf of Happy…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: Dec 17, 2020

Citations

189 A.D.3d 583 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
189 A.D.3d 583
2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 7675

Citing Cases

Nonhuman Rights Project, Inc. v. Breheny

. On petitioner's appeal, the Appellate Division unanimously affirmed, reasoning that "the writ of habeas…

Century Indem. Co. v. Brooklyn Union Gas Co.

Indeed, the First Department has held that it is "erroneous[ ]" to "refer[ ] to as ‘dicta’ " several…