From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex Parte Wells

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Feb 27, 1929
14 S.W.2d 1027 (Tex. Crim. App. 1929)

Opinion

No. 12494.

Delivered February 27, 1929.

1. — Original Habeas Corpus — To Relieve from Conviction — Refused.

Relator makes application to this court for a writ of habeas corpus. He has been convicted of murder, in Walker County. His case on appeal and on his motion for rehearing affirmed by this court. His application will be refused.

2. — Same — Continued.

The averments in the application disclose that relator is seeking to use the writ of habeas corpus as a writ of appeal. "A writ of habeas corpus cannot serve the purpose of an appeal, certiorari, mandamus or quo warranto." See Branch's Ann. P. C. sec. 239. Ex Parte Burford, 156 S.W. 686.

An original application for a writ of habeas corpus, denied.

The opinion states the case.

O. C. Wells, applicant in his own proper person.

A. A. Dawson of Canton, State's Attorney, for the State.


This is an original application for a writ of habeas corpus.

The application is without merit. Relator was convicted in the district court of Coleman County of the offense of murder and his punishment assessed at death. On appeal to this court the judgment of conviction was affirmed on May 30th, 1928. Motion for rehearing was overruled on November 28, 1928. Many of the questions now presented by relator were determined adversely to his contention in disposing of the case on appeal. The application contains averments as to irregularities in the trial which could only be availed of by appeal. If given support they would merely render the judgment voidable, and not void. The averments in the application disclose that relator is seeking to use the writ of habeas corpus as a writ of appeal. Mr. Branch, in his Annotated Penal Code of Texas, Section 239, states the rule as follows:

"A writ of habeas corpus cannot serve the purpose of an appeal, certiorari, mandamus or quo warranto."

See Ex parte Burford, 156 S.W. 686.

The writ of habeas corpus is denied.

Denied.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.


Summaries of

Ex Parte Wells

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Feb 27, 1929
14 S.W.2d 1027 (Tex. Crim. App. 1929)
Case details for

Ex Parte Wells

Case Details

Full title:EX PARTE O. C. WELLS

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Feb 27, 1929

Citations

14 S.W.2d 1027 (Tex. Crim. App. 1929)
14 S.W.2d 1027

Citing Cases

Ex Parte Overstreet

We have consistently declined to permit the writ of habeas corpus to usurp the function of an appeal, and…

Ex Parte Eugene Banspach

It is well settled by the decisions of the Court of Criminal Appeals that the merits of a case involving the…