From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex Parte Threadgill

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Oct 5, 2005
No. WR-61,645-01 (Tex. Crim. App. Oct. 5, 2005)

Opinion

No. WR-61,645-01

October 5, 2005. DO NOT PUBLISH.

On Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus Cause No. 28,207 in the 13th District Court Navarro County.


ORDER


This is a post conviction application for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.071, Tex. Code Crim. Proc. In July 2002, applicant was convicted of the offense of capital murder. The jury answered the special issues submitted pursuant to Article 37.071, Tex. Code Crim. Proc., and the trial court, accordingly, set punishment at death. This Court affirmed applicant's conviction and sentence on direct appeal. Threadgill v. State, 146 S.W.3d 654 (Tex.Crim.App. 2004). Applicant presented eight allegations in his application in which he challenges the validity of his conviction and resulting sentence. By written order dated May 18, 2005, this cause was remanded to the trial court so that the habeas corpus record could be supplemented with affidavits or testimony from counsel regarding one of applicant's allegations. Relief was denied on applicant's other allegations. On remand, applicant's counsel submitted affidavits and the trial court entered supplemental findings and conclusions recommending that relief be denied. This Court has reviewed the record. We adopt the trial judge's findings and conclusions. Based upon the trial court's findings and conclusions and our own review, the relief sought is denied. IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Ex Parte Threadgill

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Oct 5, 2005
No. WR-61,645-01 (Tex. Crim. App. Oct. 5, 2005)
Case details for

Ex Parte Threadgill

Case Details

Full title:EX PARTE RONNIE PAUL THREADGILL

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Oct 5, 2005

Citations

No. WR-61,645-01 (Tex. Crim. App. Oct. 5, 2005)

Citing Cases

Threadgill v. Quarterman

On October 5, 2005 the TCCA denied relief based on the state habeas court's findings and conclusions and on…