From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex Parte Sprouse

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Feb 3, 2010
No. WR-66,950-01 (Tex. Crim. App. Feb. 3, 2010)

Opinion

No. WR-66,950-01

Filed: February 3, 2010. DO NOT PUBLISH.

On Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus in Cause No. 26824CR/A in the 40th Judicial District Court, Ellis County.


ORDER


This is a post conviction application for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to the provisions of Texas Code of Criminal Procedure article 11.071. Applicant was convicted in 2004 of capital murder. Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 19.03(a). Based on the jury's answers to the special issues set forth in the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, Article 37.071, sections 2(b) and 2(e), the trial court sentenced him to death. Art. 37.071, § 2(g). This Court affirmed applicant's conviction and sentence on direct appeal. Sprouse v. State, No. AP-74,933, 2007 WL 283152 (Tex. Crim. App. Jan. 31, 2007) (not designated for publication). Applicant presented twelve allegations in his application in which he challenges the validity of his conviction and sentence. As to all of these allegations, the trial judge entered findings of fact and conclusions of law and recommended that relief be denied. After this Court remanded Applicant's allegations two and ten, the trial judge granted applicant's motions for funding a mental health expert, an addiction specialist, and a mitigation specialist. Applicant then developed the factual bases for his allegations two and ten and presented the trial court with reports prepared by the mental health expert, the addiction specialist, and the mitigation specialist. The trial judge then entered "Second Supplemental Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law on Order on Remand," and again recommended that relief be denied. This Court has reviewed the record with respect to the allegations made by applicant. We agree with the trial judge's recommendation and adopt the trial judge's findings and conclusions, with the following exceptions: Findings of Fact, paragraphs 6, 8, and 14; and Conclusions of Law, paragraph 2. Based upon the trial court's findings and conclusions and our own review of the record, relief is denied. IT IS SO ORDERED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2010.

Unless otherwise indicated, all references to Articles are to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure.


Summaries of

Ex Parte Sprouse

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Feb 3, 2010
No. WR-66,950-01 (Tex. Crim. App. Feb. 3, 2010)
Case details for

Ex Parte Sprouse

Case Details

Full title:EX PARTE KENT WILLIAM SPROUSE

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Feb 3, 2010

Citations

No. WR-66,950-01 (Tex. Crim. App. Feb. 3, 2010)

Citing Cases

Sprouse v. Stephens

In deciding numerous issues raised on state habeas, the state trial court rejected the argument Sprouse…