From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex Parte Spivey

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Oct 21, 1942
165 S.W.2d 111 (Tex. Crim. App. 1942)

Opinion

No. 22302.

Delivered October 21, 1942.

Appeal Dismissed — "Moot Question."

In habeas corpus proceeding, where, after appealing from an order refusing further reduction of the amount of relator's bail, relator secured sureties on his bond in the sum fixed by the district court and was released from custody, the appeal was dismissed on the ground that the question sought to be settled had become "moot."

Appeal from District Court of Gregg County. Hon. Earl Roberts, Judge.

Habeas corpus proceeding by relator. On State's motion to dismiss appeal.

Appeal dismissed.

The opinion states the case.

Florence, Florence Meredith, of Gilmer, for appellant.

Fred Erisman, District Attorney, of Longview, and Spurgeon E. Bell, State's Attorney, of Austin, for the State.


An indictment was returned into the District Court of Gregg County, Texas, on June 30, 1942, in which relator was charged with murder. On the same date that the indictment was returned the district judge fixed relator's bail at the sum of $20,000.00. Later relator obtained a writ of habeas corpus from said judge in which he sought to have the amount of said bail reduced. Upon a hearing the court reduced the bail to $10,000.00. Relator excepted, complaining that it should have been reduced to not more than $5,000.00, and later filed a motion before said trial court setting up that he had not been able to make bond in the sum of $10,000.00, and asking for a still further reduction in said bond. After a hearing the court declined to reduce the bond below the $10,000.00, whereupon appellant appealed to this court.

This court is advised by the affidavit of the District Attorney of Gregg County that on the 10th day of October, 1942, relator secured sureties on his bond in the sum of $10,000.00 and was released by the Sheriff of Gregg County, Texas, and that he is no longer confined in custody, and said District Attorney moves to dismiss the appeal because the question sought to be settled has now become moot.

The State's motion is sustained and the appeal is dismissed.


Summaries of

Ex Parte Spivey

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Oct 21, 1942
165 S.W.2d 111 (Tex. Crim. App. 1942)
Case details for

Ex Parte Spivey

Case Details

Full title:EX PARTE DAVID SPIVEY

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Oct 21, 1942

Citations

165 S.W.2d 111 (Tex. Crim. App. 1942)
165 S.W.2d 111

Citing Cases

Wright v. Brown

We have previously held that when the question becomes moot, the case is dismissed. See Ex parte Sanchez, 145…

West v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Such being its purpose, it is understandable that many provisions common to an oil and gas lease having to do…