From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex parte Somerville

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
May 3, 2017
NO. WR-31,451-14 (Tex. Crim. App. May. 3, 2017)

Summary

noting Somerville had previously filed six habeas applications and holding his claims were barred from review under Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Article 11.07 § 4 and were waived and abandoned for abuse of the writ

Summary of this case from Somerville v. Dall. Cnty. Inc.

Opinion

NO. WR-31,451-14

05-03-2017

EX PARTE KEITH LAWRENCE SOMERVILLE, Applicant


ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. W87-94983-Q(J) IN THE 204TH DISTRICT COURT FROM DALLAS COUNTY Per curiam. KELLER, P.J., not participating. ORDER

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of burglary of a habitation and sentenced to life imprisonment.

In his present application, Applicant raises two grounds. This application, however, presents a more serious question. This Court's records reflect that Applicant has filed six prior applications challenging this conviction. It is obvious from the record that Applicant continues to raise issues that have been presented and rejected in previous applications or that should have been presented in previous applications. The writ of habeas corpus is not to be lightly or easily abused. Sanders v. U.S., 373 U.S. 1 (1963); Ex parte Carr, 511 S.W.2d 523 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974). Because of his repetitive claims, we hold that Applicant's claims are barred from review under Article 11.07, § 4, and are waived and abandoned by his abuse of the writ. This application is dismissed.

Therefore, we instruct the Honorable Abel Acosta, Clerk of the Court of Criminal Appeals, not to accept or file the instant application for a writ of habeas corpus, or any future application pertaining to this conviction unless Applicant is able to show in such an application that any claims presented have not been raised previously and that they could not have been presented in a previous application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Bilton, 602 S.W.2d 534 (Tex. Crim. App. 1980).

Copies of this order shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division. Filed: May 3, 2017
Do not publish


Summaries of

Ex parte Somerville

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
May 3, 2017
NO. WR-31,451-14 (Tex. Crim. App. May. 3, 2017)

noting Somerville had previously filed six habeas applications and holding his claims were barred from review under Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Article 11.07 § 4 and were waived and abandoned for abuse of the writ

Summary of this case from Somerville v. Dall. Cnty. Inc.
Case details for

Ex parte Somerville

Case Details

Full title:EX PARTE KEITH LAWRENCE SOMERVILLE, Applicant

Court:COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

Date published: May 3, 2017

Citations

NO. WR-31,451-14 (Tex. Crim. App. May. 3, 2017)

Citing Cases

Somerville v. Dall. Cnty. Inc.

See In re Somerville, No. 05-18-00333-CV, 2018 Tex. App. LEXIS 2400, at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas Apr. 4, 2018,…