From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex parte Rush

Supreme Court of California
Jun 15, 1881
60 Cal. 5 (Cal. 1881)

Opinion

         Department Two

         Application for discharge on writ of habeas corpus. The prisoner was held under a commitment for contempt by the Superior Court of San Francisco, Department No. 10, Halsey, J., for disobeying an order of the Court requiring him to pay to one Leander Quint the sum of two hundred and seventy-five dollars as attorney's fees due the latter, for directing and managing an estate of which Rush was executor. After commitment Rush petitioned in the Supreme Court for a writ of habeas corpus, on the ground that he had no notice of the order and had no opportunity to show cause why he should not be imprisoned for his disobedience.

         The petition was granted by Morrison, C. J., and the writ made returnable before the Supreme Court, Department No. 2.

         COUNSEL

          Charles P. Goff, Attorney for Petitioner.


         OPINION          The Court:

         The proceedings required by Section 1212 of the Code of Civil Procedure to bring the petitioner into contempt, were not taken, and therefore he should be discharged. It is so ordered.


Summaries of

Ex parte Rush

Supreme Court of California
Jun 15, 1881
60 Cal. 5 (Cal. 1881)
Case details for

Ex parte Rush

Case Details

Full title:Ex parte PATRICK RUSH

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Jun 15, 1881

Citations

60 Cal. 5 (Cal. 1881)

Citing Cases

Stephenson v. Deuel

         The order of April 18, 1892, as to counsel fees, was an order constituting a basis for contempt, and…

People v. O'Brien

There being evidence on the part of the prosecution tending in some degree to show that the crime committed…