From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex Parte Quirin

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Jul 28, 1942
47 F. Supp. 431 (D.D.C. 1942)

Opinion

July 28, 1942.

Colonel Kenneth C. Royall, of Raleigh, N.C., for petitioners.

Francis B. Biddle, Atty. Gen., for respondent.


Proceeding by the United States of America on the relation of Richard Quirin, Herbert Hans Haupt, Edward John Kerling, Ernest Peter Burger, Heinrich Harm Heinck, Werner Thiel and Herman Otto Neubauer for leave to file a petition for habeas corpus.

Applications denied.

Orders affirmed, 63 S.Ct. 1, 87 L.Ed. ___, 63 S.Ct. 2, 87 L.Ed. ___.


The petitioner, Richard Quirin, asks leave to file a petition for a writ of habeas corpus by his counsel. It is conceded by petitioner's counsel that petitioner landed on the coast of the United States in June, 1942, from a German submarine, with explosives, which he was instructed by a German officer to use for the purpose of committing sabotage on certain American industries. In view of this statement of fact, it seems clear that the petitioner comes within that category of subjects, citizens or residents of a nation at war with the United States, who, by a proclamation of the President, dated July 2, 1942, are not privileged to seek any remedy or maintain any proceeding in the courts of the United States.

I do not consider that Ex parte Milligan, 4 Wall. 2, 18 L.Ed. 281, is controlling in the circumstances of this petitioner. The application of the petitioner must, therefore, be denied.


Summaries of

Ex Parte Quirin

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Jul 28, 1942
47 F. Supp. 431 (D.D.C. 1942)
Case details for

Ex Parte Quirin

Case Details

Full title:Ex parte QUIRIN (and six other cases)

Court:United States District Court, D. Columbia

Date published: Jul 28, 1942

Citations

47 F. Supp. 431 (D.D.C. 1942)

Citing Cases

Dorsey v. Gill

We accept the court's conclusion that the record, showing that Cochran was represented by counsel throughout,…