From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex Parte Presley

Supreme Court of Alabama
Mar 31, 2000
770 So. 2d 114 (Ala. 2000)

Opinion

No. 1990390.

DECIDED: March 31, 2000.

Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court, CC-98-1694; Court of Criminal Appeals, CR-98-853.

F. W. Newmann, III, Birmingham, for appellant.

A. Vernon Barnett, IV, Montgomery, for appellee.


Marcus Presley was convicted of capital murder for the killing of Marvin Smith. The murder was made capital because it was committed during a robbery in the first degree or an attempt thereof. See § 13A-5-40(a)(2), Ala. Code 1975. The jury unanimously recommended that Presley be sentenced to death. The trial court accepted the jury's recommendation and sentenced Presley to death. The Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed both the conviction and the death sentence. See Presley v. State, 770 So.2d 104 (Ala.Crim.App. 1999). Presley filed a petition for a writ of certiorari, which we granted pursuant to Rule 39(c), Ala.R.App.P.

We have carefully read and considered the briefs and the arguments of counsel. In addition, we have searched the record for any plain error, as required by Rule 39(k), Ala.R.App.P. We have found no error in either the guilt phase or the sentencing phase of the trial that adversely affected Presley's rights. Furthermore, we conclude that the trial court's findings concerning the aggravating and mitigating circumstances were supported by the evidence and that death was the proper sentence under the circumstances of this case. See § 13A-5-53(a) and (b), Ala. Code 1975. Accordingly, the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

Hooper, C.J., and Maddox, Cook, See, Lyons, Johnstone, and England, JJ., concur.

Houston, J., concurs specially.


Marcus Presley was 16 years old at the time of the offense. See my special writings of January 28, 2000, in Ex parte Pressley, 770 So.2d 143 (Ala. 2000), and Ex parte Burgess, [Ms. 1980810, January 28, 2000] ___ So.2d ___ (Ala. 2000).

Although the case now before us carries the spelling Presley, the case before us on January 28, 2000, carried the spelling Pressley. These two cases apparently, however, involve the same defendant.


Summaries of

Ex Parte Presley

Supreme Court of Alabama
Mar 31, 2000
770 So. 2d 114 (Ala. 2000)
Case details for

Ex Parte Presley

Case Details

Full title:Ex parte Marcus Presley. (Re: Marcus Presley v. State)

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Mar 31, 2000

Citations

770 So. 2d 114 (Ala. 2000)

Citing Cases

Irvin v. State

However, because Irvin contended that the State had failed to prove that he intended to rob Thompson, the…

Billups v. State

However, because Irvin contended that the State had failed to prove that he intended to rob Thompson, the…