From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex Parte Long

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Oct 14, 1914
169 S.W. 1165 (Tex. Crim. App. 1914)

Opinion

No. 3302.

Decided October 14, 1914.

Habeas Corpus — Bail — Justice of the Peace.

Where a justice of the peace granted bail in a murder case, and thereafter a district judge reached the conclusion that the case was not bailable, from which relator appealed to this court, and the facts show that the case is bailable, the judgment is reversed, the cause remanded, and bail granted.

From Harris County. Original habeas corpus trial

The opinion states the case.

No brief on file for appellant.

C.E. Lane, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.


Under habeas corpus trial relator was refused bail. The justice of the peace had previously admitted him to bond in the sum of three thousand dollars, which the record shows he was unable to give. The district judge, upon habeas corpus trial, reached the conclusion that the case was non-bailable. We do not agree with that conclusion. It is unnecessary to discuss the facts, and in obedience to our general rule we do not discuss the facts. Justice of the peace granted bail in sum of $3000, which relator could not give. The case is bailable. The judgment is reversed and bail is fixed in the sum of three thousand dollars. Upon the giving of this bond, to be approved by the sheriff of Harris county, relator will be discharged from custody under the terms of the bond.

The judgment is reversed and bail granted.

Bail granted.


Summaries of

Ex Parte Long

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Oct 14, 1914
169 S.W. 1165 (Tex. Crim. App. 1914)
Case details for

Ex Parte Long

Case Details

Full title:EX PARTE BEN LONG

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Oct 14, 1914

Citations

169 S.W. 1165 (Tex. Crim. App. 1914)
169 S.W. 1165

Citing Cases

Weaver et al. v. Hughes

"Actions against guardians, executors, administrators, sheriffs, clerks, and other public officers on their…

Jordan v. Ringstaff

Allen v. Scruggs, 190 Ala. 654, 67 So. 301; Skeggs v. Horton, 82 Ala. 352, 2 So. 110; Jaques v. Horton, 76…