From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex parte Legg

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, Panel No. 3
Oct 18, 1978
571 S.W.2d 930 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978)

Summary

In Ex parte Legg, 571 S.W.2d 930, this Court set aside appellant's conviction in No. 10566-A because the indictment alleged an impossible date.

Summary of this case from Legg v. State

Opinion

No. 59100.

October 18, 1978.

Appeal from the 42nd Judicial District Court, Taylor County, Donald H. Lane, J.

Before DOUGLAS, ROBERTS and DALLY, JJ.


OPINION


This is a post conviction writ of habeas corpus proceeding. Art. 11.07, V.A.C.C.P. The petitioner was convicted on June 18, 1970, in Taylor County for committing the offense of burglary, in Cause No. 10,566A. The indictment alleges that the offense was committed on or about the 5th day of June, 1970, but the indictment was returned and filed on the 8th day of May, 1970. Since the date alleged is an impossible date the indictment is fundamentally defective. See Moreno v. State, 375 S.W.2d 309 (Tex.Cr.App. 1964); Chadwick v. State, 252 S.W.2d 165 (Tex.Cr.App. 1952); Carver v. State, 90 Tex.Crim. 342, 235 S.W. 211 (1921); Warner v. State, 74 Tex.Crim. R., 167 S.W. 1109 (1914). The validity of a fundamentally defective indictment may be challenged in a post conviction writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Fontenot, 550 S.W.2d 87 (Tex.Cr.App. 1977).

Although the appellant has served the sentence imposed in Cause No. 10,566A, he is now imprisoned by the Department of Corrections serving time on subsequent sentences. The petitioner alleged that the relief he seeks is not moot because the collateral consequences of his conviction "adversely affect his prospects for pardon and parole and his classification and treatment in prison." Mootness cannot prohibit a collateral attack if prior convictions that have been discharged may have serious collateral consequences to a criminal defendant. Ex parte Guzman, 551 S.W.2d 387 (Tex.Cr.App. 1977).

The relief sought is granted. The conviction in Cause No. 10,566A in Taylor County is set aside and the indictment is ordered dismissed.

DOUGLAS, J., dissents.


Summaries of

Ex parte Legg

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, Panel No. 3
Oct 18, 1978
571 S.W.2d 930 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978)

In Ex parte Legg, 571 S.W.2d 930, this Court set aside appellant's conviction in No. 10566-A because the indictment alleged an impossible date.

Summary of this case from Legg v. State
Case details for

Ex parte Legg

Case Details

Full title:Ex parte Lloyd Lawrence LEGG

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, Panel No. 3

Date published: Oct 18, 1978

Citations

571 S.W.2d 930 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978)

Citing Cases

Legg v. State

The judgment in No. 4898-B reflects that the prior conviction in No. 10566-A was used to enhance punishment.…

Ex Parte Ridley

This paradoxical result flows from this Court's adherence to the view that one need not be in custody as a…