From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex Parte Kemp

Supreme Court of Alabama
Nov 20, 1919
83 So. 485 (Ala. 1919)

Opinion

1 Div. 128.

November 20, 1919.

Gaillard, Mahornor Arnold, of Mobile, for appellants.

Counsel fees could not be allowed as damages. 124 Ala. 614, 27 So. 454; 100 Ala. 286, 14 So. 44; 65 Ala. 417; 63 Neb. 638, 88 N.W. 860; 2 Neb. (Unof.) 512, 89 N.W. 412; 65 Ill. App. 646. There was no dispute as to the fact, and judgment should here be rendered for the defendants. Section 2890, Code 1907; Acts 1915, p. 824; 178 Ala. 340, 60 So. 88.

Smiths, Young Leigh, of Mobile, for appellees.

No brief appears in the record.


Petitioners were appellants in the Court of Appeals. By that court the judgment of the trial court was reversed and remanded. One of the judges thought the judgment should be rendered. Petitioners now seek to have the cause disposed of in accordance with the minority opinion in the Court of Appeals. The cause was tried by the court without the intervention of a jury. The Court of Appeals, finding error, was authorized to reverse and remand or render, as it deemed right. Code, § 5361; Munson S. S. Line v. Horace Turner Co., 81 So. 76. Its discretion in that regard depended upon the facts, and this court will not review the Court of Appeals on questions of fact. Postal Tel. Cable Co. v. Minderhout, 195 Ala. 420, 71 So. 91.

Application denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and GARDNER and THOMAS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ex Parte Kemp

Supreme Court of Alabama
Nov 20, 1919
83 So. 485 (Ala. 1919)
Case details for

Ex Parte Kemp

Case Details

Full title:Ex parte KEMP et al

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Nov 20, 1919

Citations

83 So. 485 (Ala. 1919)
83 So. 485

Citing Cases

Hendricks v. State

Thos. F. Seale, Jr., of Livingston, and Jas. S. Coleman, Jr., of Eutaw, opposed. If the judgment is reversed…