From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex Parte Johnson

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
May 11, 1932
49 S.W.2d 788 (Tex. Crim. App. 1932)

Opinion

No. 15372.

Delivered May 11, 1932.

1. — Requisition — Extradition.

A requisition is not authorized to issue upon a showing that the alleged fugitive is charged in the demanding state by information.

2. — Same.

The recital in the executive warrant is prima facie evidence that the charge against the relator is by information.

Appeal from the District Court of Gregg County. Tried below before the Hon. Will C. Hurst, Judge.

Appeal by relator from an order refusing to discharge.

Reversed, and relator ordered discharged.

The opinion states the case.

Harvey P. Shead, of Longview, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State's Attorney, of Austin, for the State.


This is an appeal from an order refusing to discharge the relator on a writ of habeas corpus.

From the record it appears that the requisition issued by the Governor of Texas recites that it has been made known to him by the Governor of Oklahoma that T. H. (Cyclone) Johnson stands charged by information and bench warrant before the proper authorities with the crime of disposing of mortgaged property committed in said state, and that said defendant has taken refuge in the state of Texas.

It has been uniformly held by the courts of this state that the governor is not authorized to issue a requisition upon the showing that the alleged fugitive is charged in the demanding state by information. The demand should show that the alleged fugitive is charged by complaint, affidavit or indictment. The recital in the executive warrant is prima facie evidence that the charge against the relator is by information. The papers accompanying the application for a requisition are not before this court; nor is there legal evidence controverting the correctness of the recital mentioned. The proof before this court, therefore, is that the relator is not properly charged with an offense and that the governor's warrant is not authority for the further detention of the relator. See Gibson v. State, 96 Tex.Crim. Rep., 257 S.W. 1101; Ex parte Holt, 92 Tex.Crim. Rep., 244 S.W. 1016; Ex parte Lewis, 75 Tex.Crim. Rep., 170 S.W. 1098.

The judgment is reversed and the relator ordered discharged.

Reversed and relator ordered discharged.


Summaries of

Ex Parte Johnson

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
May 11, 1932
49 S.W.2d 788 (Tex. Crim. App. 1932)
Case details for

Ex Parte Johnson

Case Details

Full title:EX PARTE T. H. (CYCLONE) JOHNSON

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: May 11, 1932

Citations

49 S.W.2d 788 (Tex. Crim. App. 1932)
49 S.W.2d 788