From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex Parte Hernandez

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Feb 28, 2007
No. WR-66,629-01 (Tex. Crim. App. Feb. 28, 2007)

Opinion

No. WR-66,629-01

Filed: February 28, 2007. DO NOT PUBLISH.

On Application for a writ of Habeas Corpus, Cause No. Cr04-0176-01, appeal from the 415th District Court, from Parker County.


ORDER


Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex.Crim.App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of driving while intoxicated and sentenced to eighteen (18) years' imprisonment. The Second Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Hernandez v. State, No. 2-05-161-CR (Tex.App.-Fort Worth May 25, 2006), pet. ref'd). Applicant contends that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance during plea negotiations because counsel advised Applicant that the State had no evidence, in particular no videotape evidence; and counsel did not advise Applicant that the State's plea offer of four (4) years would expire if he did not accept it within a certain time period. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 608 (1984); Ex parte Lemke, 13 S.W.3d 791,795-96 (Tex.Crim.App. 2000). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex.Crim.App. 1997), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall provide Applicant's trial counsel with the opportunity to respond to Applicant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court may use any means set out in Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07, § 3(d). In the appropriate case, the trial court may rely on its personal recollection. Id. If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 26.04. The trial court shall make findings of fact as to whether the performance of Applicant's trial attorney was deficient and, if so, whether counsel's deficient performance prejudiced Applicant. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant's claim for habeas corpus relief. This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. If any continuances are granted, a copy of the order granting the continuance shall be sent to this Court. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter's notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court's supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be returned to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court.


Summaries of

Ex Parte Hernandez

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Feb 28, 2007
No. WR-66,629-01 (Tex. Crim. App. Feb. 28, 2007)
Case details for

Ex Parte Hernandez

Case Details

Full title:EX PARTE MATIAS HERNANDEZ, Applicant

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Feb 28, 2007

Citations

No. WR-66,629-01 (Tex. Crim. App. Feb. 28, 2007)