From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex Parte Harrison

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Oct 26, 2005
No. AP-75,272 (Tex. Crim. App. Oct. 26, 2005)

Opinion

No. AP-75,272

Delivered: October 26, 2005. DO NOT PUBLISH.

On Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, Cause No. 199-81868-02 in the 199th Judicial District Court, Collin County.


OPINION


This is a post-conviction application for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to tex. code crim. proc. art. 11.07. Applicant was convicted of assault on a public servant. Punishment was assessed at twenty-five years imprisonment. This conviction was affirmed, Harrison v. State, No. 10-03-00333-CR (Tex.App.Waco, delivered October 13, 2004, no pet.). Applicant contends that he was denied an opportunity to file a pro se petition for discretionary review because his appellate attorney did not timely advise him of the affirmance of his conviction on direct appeal, and of his right to pursue discretionary review on his own. The record reflects that Applicant was not informed, in a timely manner, of the appellate court's decision, and of his right to pursue a pro se petition for discretionary review. In Ex parte Wilson, 956 S.W.2d 25 (Tex.Crim.App. 1997), we held that for counsel to render effective assistance on appeal, he, or she, must notify the client the case has been affirmed and that the client can pursue discretionary review on his own. Applicant is entitled to relief. The proper remedy in a case like this is to return Applicant to the point at which he can file a petition for discretionary review. He may then follow the proper procedures in order that a meaningful petition for discretionary review may be filed. For purposes of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, all time limits shall be calculated as if the Court of Appeals' decision had been rendered on the day the mandate of this Court in this cause issues. We hold that should Applicant desire to seek discretionary review, he must take affirmative steps to see that his petition is filed in the Court of Appeals within thirty days after the mandate of this Court has issued. Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions and Parole Divisions.


Summaries of

Ex Parte Harrison

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Oct 26, 2005
No. AP-75,272 (Tex. Crim. App. Oct. 26, 2005)
Case details for

Ex Parte Harrison

Case Details

Full title:EX PARTE ROBERT EARL HARRISON, Applicant

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Oct 26, 2005

Citations

No. AP-75,272 (Tex. Crim. App. Oct. 26, 2005)