From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex Parte Green

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Jul 13, 1977
553 S.W.2d 382 (Tex. Crim. App. 1977)

Summary

In Ex parte Green, 548 S.W.2d 914 (Tex.Cr.App. 1977), this Court stated: "A petitioner must decide which form [sic] he will proceed in because this Court will not and the trial court in this State should not consider a petitioner's application so long as the federal courts retain jurisdiction of the same matter.

Summary of this case from Carter v. Estelle

Opinion

No. 54906.

July 13, 1977.

Appeal from the 9th Judicial District Court, Montgomery County, Ernest Coker, J.

Gregory L. Hennig, Houston, for appellant.

Jim D. Vollers, State's Atty., and David S. McAngus, Asst. State's Atty., Austin, for the State.


OPINION


This is an appeal from an order denying appellant's application for writ of habeas corpus and refusing appellant's application for bail. Appellant stands indicted for the offense of capital murder.

In order to meet its burden of proof to establish the proof is evident, the State offered the testimony of a deputy sheriff who observed the scene of the alleged offense and who interviewed appellant after he had been taken into custody. This testimony established that deceased was found in the kitchen of his home; deceased had been shot; and "the kitchen was tore up". A written statement given by appellant was admitted into evidence over objection.

Appellant's sister also testified at the hearing on the habeas corpus application. She stated appellant did not own a house and to her knowledge did not own a car. She stated appellant's family would try to make a bond in the amount of $10,000.00.

Although the decision of the trial judge that the proof is evident is entitled to weight on appeal, we cannot conclude that "the proof is 'evident' that the jury would answer the required questions in the affirmative as required by Art. 37.071, V.A.C.C.P." See Ex parte Wilson, Tex.Cr.App., 527 S.W.2d 310, 312; Ex parte Cevallos, Tex.Cr.App., 537 S.W.2d 744; Ex parte Hammond, Tex.Cr.App., 540 S.W.2d 328; Ex parte Derese, Tex.Cr.App., 540 S.W.2d 332. Cf. Ex parte Davis, Tex.Cr.App., 542 S.W.2d 192.

The judgment of the trial court denying bail to the appellant is reversed. Bail is set in the amount of $25,000.00.

DOUGLAS, J., dissents.


Summaries of

Ex Parte Green

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Jul 13, 1977
553 S.W.2d 382 (Tex. Crim. App. 1977)

In Ex parte Green, 548 S.W.2d 914 (Tex.Cr.App. 1977), this Court stated: "A petitioner must decide which form [sic] he will proceed in because this Court will not and the trial court in this State should not consider a petitioner's application so long as the federal courts retain jurisdiction of the same matter.

Summary of this case from Carter v. Estelle

In Ex Parte Green, 548 S.W.2d 914 (Tex.Cr.App. 1977), this Court stated: "A petitioner must decide which forum he will proceed in because this Court will not and the trial court in this state should not consider a petitioner's application so long as the federal courts retain jurisdiction of the same matter.

Summary of this case from Carter v. Estelle
Case details for

Ex Parte Green

Case Details

Full title:Ex parte G. W. GREEN

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Jul 13, 1977

Citations

553 S.W.2d 382 (Tex. Crim. App. 1977)

Citing Cases

Carter v. Estelle

It was dismissed by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals on February 2, 1977, because No. 74-H-1603 was still…

In re Hearn

Through its judicially-created two-forum rule, Texas prevented petitioners from lodging a mixed petition in…