From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex Parte Galloway

Supreme Court of Alabama
May 17, 1923
96 So. 369 (Ala. 1923)

Opinion

3 Div. 612.

April 26, 1923. Rehearing Denied May 17, 1923.

Weil, Stakely Vardaman, of Montgomery, for petitioner.

L. A. Sanderson, of Montgomery, opposed.


Petition for certiorari to review the judgment of reversal entered by the Court of Appeals in the appeal of Day v. Galloway, 96 So. 365. The Court of Appeals held that the trial court erred in giving the general affirmative charge for the plaintiff, appellee. This conclusion involved, necessarily, a finding of fact, to review or revise which this court will not exert its powers or authority through certiorari. Ex parte Steverson, 177 Ala. 384, 389, 58 So. 992; Ex parte Williams, 182 Ala. 34, 37, 62 So. 63; 13 Mich. Ala. Dig. 433. There is presented a nonreviewable question only; and, without passing upon the matter in any way, the writ is denied.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SOMERVILLE and THOMAS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ex Parte Galloway

Supreme Court of Alabama
May 17, 1923
96 So. 369 (Ala. 1923)
Case details for

Ex Parte Galloway

Case Details

Full title:Ex parte GALLOWAY

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: May 17, 1923

Citations

96 So. 369 (Ala. 1923)
209 Ala. 469

Citing Cases

Tuggle v. State

They do not properly state the law. Davis v. State (Ala.App.) 96 So. 369, and cases cited; Ex parte Davis,…

Russell v. State

Jas. M. Prestwood, of Andalusia, opposed. The Court of Appeals properly applied the law to the facts, and…