From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex Parte Coleman

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Mar 22, 1921
115 S.C. 515 (S.C. 1921)

Opinion

10593

March 22, 1921.

Before SEASE, J., Union. Reversed.

Appeal from an order allowing interest on attorney's fees of Wallace Barron and Geo. S. Mower fixed by decree of the Probate Court.

For former appeals see: 106 S.C. 534; 111 S.C. 484.

Mr. John Gary Evans, for appellant, cites: Attorneys' fees do not bear interest until reduced to judgment: 55 S.C. 322. Judgment must be enrolled: Code Proc. 1912. Sec. 73; 1 Civ. Code 1912, Sec. 2516. No execution could be issued: Code Proc. 1912, Sec. 75; 30 S.C. 421. Judgment in Probate Court is entered when inscribed on the abstract of judgments and enrolled: Code Proc. 1912, Sec. 74. Not adjudicated in former appeals: 111 S.C. 484.

Messrs. Wallace Barron, for respondents, cite: Decree of Judge Smith is res adjudicata: 1 Civ. Code 1912. Sec. 2516; 106 S.C. 541; 111 S.C. 486. Attorney's fees draw interest after entry of judgment: 55 S.C. 316; 49 S.C. 525.


March 22, 1921. The opinion of the Court was delivered by


This is the third appeal in this cause. This is an appeal from an order of his Honor, Judge Sease, sustaining an order of Probate Judge W.W. Johnson, wherein interest was allowed on attorneys' fee, due to Wallace Barron and Geo. S. Mower, Esqs. The exceptions must be sustained. There was no entry and enrollment of the judgment, as the law provides for, so to make it a money judgment. "A decretal order upon which an execution may be taken out is a final decree." Haskell v. Raoul, 1 McCord, Eq. 32. "It must be a decree upon which an execution could be issued." Ex parte Farrars in re Garrett v. Dial, 13 S.C. 254.

Exceptions sustained, and order appealed from reversed.


Summaries of

Ex Parte Coleman

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Mar 22, 1921
115 S.C. 515 (S.C. 1921)
Case details for

Ex Parte Coleman

Case Details

Full title:EX PARTE COLEMAN ET AL. PETITION OF WALLACE BARRON ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of South Carolina

Date published: Mar 22, 1921

Citations

115 S.C. 515 (S.C. 1921)
106 S.E. 572

Citing Cases

Daniel v. Hazel

t to direct the verdict: 174 S.C. 532, 178 S.E. 145; 239 S.C. 44, 121 S.E.2d 240; (S.C.) 125 S.E.2d 889. As…