From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex parte Biggers

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
Oct 30, 2019
NO. WR-85,608-02 (Tex. Crim. App. Oct. 30, 2019)

Opinion

NO. WR-85,608-02

10-30-2019

EX PARTE PRESLEY KEVIN BIGGERS, Applicant


ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. C-35,133 IN THE 244TH DISTRICT COURT FROM ECTOR COUNTY Per curiam. ORDER

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of sexual assault and sentenced to life imprisonment. The Eleventh Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Biggers v. State, No. 11-09-00064-CR (Tex. App.—Eastland Mar. 28, 2011).

Applicant contends, among other things, that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to object to extraneous conduct, failing to challenge evidence, failing to challenge the sentence, failing to challenge the indictment, and failing to object to the jury charge.

Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant's claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court may use any means set out in TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether the performance of Applicant's trial counsel was deficient and, if so, whether counsel's deficient performance prejudiced Applicant. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant's claim for habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter's notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court's supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time must be requested by the trial court and shall be obtained from this Court. Filed: October 30, 2019 Do not publish


Summaries of

Ex parte Biggers

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
Oct 30, 2019
NO. WR-85,608-02 (Tex. Crim. App. Oct. 30, 2019)
Case details for

Ex parte Biggers

Case Details

Full title:EX PARTE PRESLEY KEVIN BIGGERS, Applicant

Court:COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

Date published: Oct 30, 2019

Citations

NO. WR-85,608-02 (Tex. Crim. App. Oct. 30, 2019)

Citing Cases

Wilson v. Joughin

It was held that under the rules of the common law the writer of the letter could not be adjudged in…

Wilson v. Joughin

" The question presented here was not presented in the case of Ex Parte Earman, 85 Fla. 297, 97 So. 775, nor…