Opinion
February 26, 1941.
W.P. Everts, for the plaintiffs.
G.E. Lodgen, for the defendant.
Decree affirmed with costs. The defendant's illuminated sign is not shown to be a nuisance. If it unlawfully projected towards the street beyond a building line established under G.L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 82, § 37, the remedy must be sought by public authorities rather than by neighboring residents or proprietors. Hagerty v. McGovern, 187 Mass. 479. Mullholland v. State Racing Commission, 295 Mass. 286, 290, 291. Mayor of Cambridge v. Dean, 300 Mass. 174.