holding that "[d]uress by [someone] other than the opposing party to a contract cannot constitute compulsion sufficient to void the contract"
Summary of this case from Phillips v. Orleans Cnty.No. 93-7737.
July 5, 1994.
E.D.N.Y., 827 F.Supp. 911.
AFFIRMED
holding that "[d]uress by [someone] other than the opposing party to a contract cannot constitute compulsion sufficient to void the contract"
Summary of this case from Phillips v. Orleans Cnty.Full title:Evans v. Waldorf-Astoria Corp
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Date published: Jul 5, 1994
United States v. Yemitan, 70 F.3d 746, 748 (2d Cir. 1995), aff'd, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 27133 (2d Cir. Oct.…
Vazquez v. Salomon Smith Barney Inc.OC or the Court that Smith Barney discriminated against Plaintiff, the mere fact that it may have breached…