From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Eugene D. v. Karman

U.S.
Jun 11, 1990
496 U.S. 931 (1990)

Summary

holding a motion for summary judgment under Rule 56 of the Rules of Civil Procedure was improper on the issues raised in the certiorari petition, because the superior court could not admit or rely upon factual considerations, not considered by the town council and not included in the administrative record

Summary of this case from Henderson v. Cnty. of Onslow

Opinion

No. 89-1651.

June 11, 1990.


ORDER

C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. JUSTICE BLACKMUN would grant certiorari. Reported below: 889 F. 2d 701.


Summaries of

Eugene D. v. Karman

U.S.
Jun 11, 1990
496 U.S. 931 (1990)

holding a motion for summary judgment under Rule 56 of the Rules of Civil Procedure was improper on the issues raised in the certiorari petition, because the superior court could not admit or rely upon factual considerations, not considered by the town council and not included in the administrative record

Summary of this case from Henderson v. Cnty. of Onslow

allowing disclosure in search warrant affidavit; affidavit had been sealed; redacted copy released

Summary of this case from State v. Gilmore
Case details for

Eugene D. v. Karman

Case Details

Full title:EUGENE D., A MINOR, BY AND THROUGH HIS MOTHER AND NEXT FRIEND, OLIVIA D…

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jun 11, 1990

Citations

496 U.S. 931 (1990)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Amodeo

We have previously held that "[t]the privacy interests of innocent third parties . . . should weigh heavily…

Women v. Gomez

However, a woman's right of privacy encompasses her decision whether to choose health care services necessary…