From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Eubanks v. Comm'r of Corr.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 20, 2016
149 A.3d 980 (Conn. 2016)

Opinion

09-20-2016

David Eubanks v. Commissioner of Correction

Margaret Gaffney Radionovas, senior assistant state's attorney, in support of the petition. Deren Manasevit, assigned counsel, in opposition.


Margaret Gaffney Radionovas, senior assistant state's attorney, in support of the petition.

Deren Manasevit, assigned counsel, in opposition.

The respondent's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 166 Conn. App. 1, 140 A.3d 402 (2016), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court correctly determine that the habeas court incorrectly rendered judgment for the respondent on the petitioner's claim that his trial counsel was ineffective in failing to object to portions of the testimony of Tanika McCotter in a transcript admitted under the former testimony exception to the hearsay rule, on the ground that they were ‘double hearsay’?”


Summaries of

Eubanks v. Comm'r of Corr.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 20, 2016
149 A.3d 980 (Conn. 2016)
Case details for

Eubanks v. Comm'r of Corr.

Case Details

Full title:David Eubanks v. Commissioner of Correction

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Sep 20, 2016

Citations

149 A.3d 980 (Conn. 2016)
323 Conn. 911

Citing Cases

Eubanks v. Comm'r of Corr.

This court granted the respondent's petition for certification, limited to the following issue: "Did the…