From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Etheridge v. Astrue

United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Northern Division
Sep 29, 2009
CIVIL ACTION 08-00357-WS-B (S.D. Ala. Sep. 29, 2009)

Summary

finding of "severe" physical impairments at step 2 ipso facto was a finding that the claimant had shown an impairment as required by the second prong of Listing 12.05C

Summary of this case from Black v. Astrue

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION 08-00357-WS-B.

September 29, 2009


ORDER


After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and there having been no objections filed, the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and dated September 10, 2009, is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court.

DONE and ORDERED.


Summaries of

Etheridge v. Astrue

United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Northern Division
Sep 29, 2009
CIVIL ACTION 08-00357-WS-B (S.D. Ala. Sep. 29, 2009)

finding of "severe" physical impairments at step 2 ipso facto was a finding that the claimant had shown an impairment as required by the second prong of Listing 12.05C

Summary of this case from Black v. Astrue
Case details for

Etheridge v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:CORNELIUS ETHERIDGE, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Northern Division

Date published: Sep 29, 2009

Citations

CIVIL ACTION 08-00357-WS-B (S.D. Ala. Sep. 29, 2009)

Citing Cases

Black v. Astrue

Consequently, it cannot now be disputed that Plaintiff has "a physical or other mental impairment imposing an…

Black v. Astrue

Consequently, it cannot now be disputed that Plaintiff has "a physical or other mental impairment imposing an…