From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Estruch v. Volkswagenwerk

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 4, 1983
97 A.D.2d 978 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)

Opinion

November 4, 1983

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Monroe County, Siracuse, J.

Present — Hancock, Jr., J.P., Callahan, Denman, Boomer and Moule, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: Inasmuch as the individual claims for damages under subdivision (h) of section 349 and subdivision 3 of section 350-d Gen. Bus. of the General Business Law have been found to be without merit plaintiffs may not, as representatives, maintain a class action based on those sections (see CPLR 901, subd a, par 3; McLaughlin, Practice Commentaries, McKinney's Cons Laws of NY, Book 7B, CPLR C901:4; Kindel v Kaufman Broad Homes, 67 A.D.2d 938; Rapp v Dime Sav. Bank, 64 A.D.2d 964, affd 48 N.Y.2d 658); thus, the class causes of action were properly dismissed.


Summaries of

Estruch v. Volkswagenwerk

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 4, 1983
97 A.D.2d 978 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)
Case details for

Estruch v. Volkswagenwerk

Case Details

Full title:CINDY ESTRUCH et al., and All Others Similarly Situated, Respondents, v…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 4, 1983

Citations

97 A.D.2d 978 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)

Citing Cases

Gridley v. Turnbury Village, LLC

Since the plaintiff has no viable causes of action, the plaintiff's motion for class action certification was…

Globe Surgical Supply v. Geico Ins. Co.

In such case, the class action would fail as well. (82 NY Jur2d, Parties, § 267; see Banks v. County of…