From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Estate v. Epperson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Sep 19, 1995
909 P.2d 62 (Okla. 1995)

Summary

In Steen, a mother and daughter held a certificate of deposit and other bank accounts in joint tenancy with rights of survivorship. Upon the mother's death, the daughter was appointed executrix and filed an inventory of her mother's estate.

Summary of this case from Pollock v. Phillips (In re Phillips)

Opinion

No. 76772.

July 18, 1995. Rehearings Denied September 19, 1995.

Appeal from the District Court, Tulsa County, David E. Winslow, J.

Byron D. Todd, Margaret M. Perrault, Tulsa, for Appellant.

J. Barry Epperson, Janine H. Vanvalkenburgh, Tulsa, for Appellee Epperson.

M.M. McDougal, Tulsa, for Appellee Edwards.


ORDER APPROVING COURT OF APPEALS OPINION FOR PUBLICATION AS AMENDED BY THIS ORDER

Certiorari was previously granted by this court. For the following reason, we have determined that the memorandum opinion of the Court of Appeals, Division III rendered on March 3, 1992 should be amended. While we concur in the findings expressed therein, we are of the view that wherever the term "jurisdiction" appears, in reference to the jurisdiction of the district judge sitting in probate, the term "authority" be used instead. Although, under the 1967 constitutional amendment a district judge now has unlimited "jurisdiction" to hear probate matters, the "authority" of the district judge remains limited by the statutory restrictions set forth in the probate statutes until such time as the legislature amends them.

The opinion in all other respects remains the same. Further, because we are of the view that the amended opinion will add clarity to the law it is approved for publication in the official reporter pursuant to 20 O.S. 1991 § 30.5[ 20-30.5] and accorded precedential value.

/s/ Alma Wilson Chief Justice

ALMA WILSON, C.J., and HODGES, LAVENDER, SIMMS and HARGRAVE, JJ., concur.

KAUGER, V.C.J., and SUMMERS, J., dissent.

WATT, J., dissents for the reasons set out in Wilson v. Kane, 852 P.2d 717 (Okla. 1993).


Summaries of

Estate v. Epperson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Sep 19, 1995
909 P.2d 62 (Okla. 1995)

In Steen, a mother and daughter held a certificate of deposit and other bank accounts in joint tenancy with rights of survivorship. Upon the mother's death, the daughter was appointed executrix and filed an inventory of her mother's estate.

Summary of this case from Pollock v. Phillips (In re Phillips)
Case details for

Estate v. Epperson

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF RUBY E. STEEN, DECEASED, ROBERTA ANN…

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Sep 19, 1995

Citations

909 P.2d 62 (Okla. 1995)
1995 OK 86

Citing Cases

Pollock v. Phillips (In re Phillips)

”Section 1 of title 58 of the Oklahoma Statutes (hereafter “58 O.S. § 1 ”) defines the jurisdiction of the…

Vose v. Lee (In re Estate of Vose)

Although, under the 1967 constitutional amendment a district judge now has unlimited "jurisdiction" to hear…