From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Estate of Mollo v. Rothman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 4, 2001
284 A.D.2d 299 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Argued May 8, 2001.

June 4, 2001

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice and wrongful death, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (O'Connell, J.), dated March 30, 2000, which granted the motion of the defendant Ivan Rothman and the separate motion of the defendants David Kinne and Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

McAndrew, Conboy Prisco, Woodbury, N.Y. (Robert M. Ortiz of counsel), for appellant.

Slevin, Sold, Neubardt, Weisman, Samberg, Faillace Mezzacappa, Mineola, N.Y. (Belinda D. Dodds-Marshall and Maribeth Slevin of counsel), for respondent Ivan Rothman.

Kopff, Nardelli Dopf, LLP, New York, N.Y. (Martin B. Adams of counsel), for respondents David Kinne and Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center.

Before: DAVID S. RITTER, J.P., WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, HOWARD MILLER, STEPHEN G. CRANE, JJ.


ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

The defendants established through competent medical affidavits and deposition testimony that they did not contribute to or proximately cause the decedent's death (see, Amsler v. Verrilli, 119 A.D.2d 786). Thus, the Supreme Court properly determined that the defendants made a prima facie showing of entitlement to summary judgment.

The affidavit of the plaintiff's expert, submitted in opposition, failed to raise a triable issue of fact that the defendants' omissions or departures were a competent producing cause of death (see, Yasin v. Manhattan Eye, Ear Throat Hosp., 254 A.D.2d 281; Domaradzki v. Glen Cove OB/GYN Assocs., 242 A.D.2d 282; Gross v. Friedman, 138 A.D.2d 571, affd 73 N.Y.2d 721). The affidavit contained only bare conclusory allegations and assumed material facts not supported by the evidence (see, Tucker v. Elimelech, 184 A.D.2d 636). As the plaintiff failed to rebut the defendants' prima facie showing of entitlement to summary judgment, the complaint was properly dismissed.

RITTER, J.P., FRIEDMANN, H. MILLER and CRANE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Estate of Mollo v. Rothman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 4, 2001
284 A.D.2d 299 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Estate of Mollo v. Rothman

Case Details

Full title:ESTATE OF MARIA MOLLO, ETC., APPELLANT, v. IVAN ROTHMAN, ET AL.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 4, 2001

Citations

284 A.D.2d 299 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
725 N.Y.S.2d 560

Citing Cases

Vissichelli v. Glen-Haven Residential Health Care Facility, Inc.

r., 84 AD3d 1348; Newport v Rogosin Inst., 71 AD3d 856; White v Southside Hosp., 5 AD3d 677). The defendants'…

Thompson v. Orner

OB/GYN Assoc., 242 AD2d 282). "General allegations that are conclusory and unsupported by competent evidence…