From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Estate of Freeman v. J.L. Rothrock

Supreme Court of North Carolina
May 1, 2009
363 N.C. 249 (N.C. 2009)

Opinion

          Jay Gervasi, P.A., by Jay A. Gervasi, Jr., Greensboro, for plaintiff-appellant.

          Brooks, Stevens & Pope, P.A., by Joy H. Brewer and Ginny P. Lanier, Cary, for defendant-appellees.


          PER CURIAM.

          The decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for consideration of the remaining assignments of error. Discretionary review was improvidently allowed as to the additional issues.

         REVERSED AND REMANDED; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.


Summaries of

Estate of Freeman v. J.L. Rothrock

Supreme Court of North Carolina
May 1, 2009
363 N.C. 249 (N.C. 2009)
Case details for

Estate of Freeman v. J.L. Rothrock

Case Details

Full title:ESTATE OF RANDY BENNETT FREEMAN, EMPLOYEE, DEBORAH LYNN FREEMAN, FIDUCIARY…

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: May 1, 2009

Citations

363 N.C. 249 (N.C. 2009)
363 N.C. 249

Citing Cases

Freeman v. Rothrock

JACKSON, Judge. This case is heard upon remand from our Supreme Court, see Estate of Freeman v. J.L.…

Stout v. Appalachian State University

In adopting the dissenting opinion, the Supreme Court, in effect, held that creating a misrepresentation…