From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Estate of Burnett

Court of Appeal of California, Fourth District
Jul 10, 1935
8 Cal.App.2d 363 (Cal. Ct. App. 1935)

Opinion

Docket No. 1379.

July 10, 1935.

MOTION to recall and correct a remittitur. Granted.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Robert B. Gaylord and W.R. Bailey for Appellant.

Russell Heid for Respondents.


This is a motion to recall a remittitur and to order a corrected remittitur to be issued nunc pro tunc. [1] On April 11, 1935, this court filed its decision in the matter of the Estate of W.I. Burnett, Deceased, and reversed a decree of distribution without making any provision for the payment of costs. ( Estate of Burnett, 6 Cal.App. (2d) 116 [ 44 P.2d 435].) On June 11, 1935, a remittitur was issued in which the following erroneously appeared: "Appellant to recover costs on appeal." (Sec. 1232, Probate Code.)

In Estate of Erickson, 4 Cal.App. (2d) 602 [ 41 P.2d 939], where a similar question was before the court, a similar motion was granted. (See Estate of Johnson, 200 Cal. 307 [ 252 P. 1052].)

It is ordered that the remittitur issued by the clerk of this court on June 11, 1935, in the matter of the Estate of W.I. Burnett, Deceased, be recalled and that a corrected remittitur be issued in its place, nunc pro tunc, omitting the words, "Appellant to recover costs on appeal."

Barnard, P.J., and Jennings, J., concurred.


Summaries of

Estate of Burnett

Court of Appeal of California, Fourth District
Jul 10, 1935
8 Cal.App.2d 363 (Cal. Ct. App. 1935)
Case details for

Estate of Burnett

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Estate of W.I. BURNETT, Deceased

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Fourth District

Date published: Jul 10, 1935

Citations

8 Cal.App.2d 363 (Cal. Ct. App. 1935)
47 P.2d 745

Citing Cases

Estate of Wallace

ame to be corrected by striking therefrom the words, "Appellants to recover costs on appeal," upon the…

In re Burnett’s Estate

Affirmed. --------- Notes: [†]Prior opinion, 47 P.2d…