From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Esso Standard Oil Co. v. Holderman

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Mar 4, 1963
39 N.J. 355 (N.J. 1963)

Opinion

Argued February 18, 1963 —

Decided March 4, 1963.

Appeal from Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Mr. John W. Fritz and Mr. Edward B. Meredith argued the cause for the appellants ( Messrs. Wharton, Stewart Davis, attorneys). Mr. Theodore I. Botter argued the cause for the respondent ( Mr. Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General, attorney).


The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Conford in the Appellate Division.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB, and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN — 6.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Esso Standard Oil Co. v. Holderman

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Mar 4, 1963
39 N.J. 355 (N.J. 1963)
Case details for

Esso Standard Oil Co. v. Holderman

Case Details

Full title:ESSO STANDARD OIL COMPANY ET AL., PLAINTIFFS, v. CARL HOLDERMAN…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Mar 4, 1963

Citations

39 N.J. 355 (N.J. 1963)
188 A.2d 599

Citing Cases

Tremonte v. Jersey Plastic Molders, Inc.

"The policy of the compensation law is that compensation shall be paid for every compensable experience, and…

State v. Levine

See Esso Standard Oil Co. v. Holderman, 75 N.J. Super. 455 [ 183 A.2d 454] (App.Div. 1962), aff'd, 39 N.J.…