Opinion
June 17, 1991
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Cohalan, J.).
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
Upon review of the record, we find that the court properly denied the defendant's cross motion for summary judgment. A triable issue of fact exists as to whether he notarized a deed containing forged signatures resulting in a fraudulent conveyance of certain property upon which the plaintiff was induced to lend money. Mangano, P.J., Kooper, Harwood and Balletta, JJ., concur.