From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Espinoza v. Diaz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 26, 2001
280 A.D.2d 639 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Argued January 26, 2001

February 26, 2001.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kitzes, J.), dated March 29, 2000, which granted the motion of the defendants Oscar Diaz and Martha Rodriguez and the separate motion of the defendant Steven Schwartz for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

Michael A. Cervini, Jackson Heights, N.Y. (Robin Mary Heaney of counsel), for appellant.

Birzon, Quinn, Strang Huber, Smithtown, N.Y. (Thomas M. Quinn of counsel), for respondents Oscar Diaz and Martha Rodriguez.

Before: KRAUSMAN, J.P., S. MILLER, McGINITY and FEUERSTEIN, JJ., concur.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

This action arises from a three-car collision in which a car driven by the defendant Tydell Gresham hit the rear of a car driven by the defendant Oscar Diaz and owned by the defendant Martha Rodriguez, and in which the plaintiff was a passenger. The vehicle driven by Diaz struck the vehicle driven by the defendant Steven Schwartz in the rear.

The defendants Schwartz, Diaz, and Rodriguez moved for summary judgment, presenting a prima facie case sufficient to establish that Diaz and Schwartz came to a complete stop, without contact, and that the vehicle operated by the defendant Gresham hit the Diaz vehicle. The plaintiff's testimony at her examination before trial that the Schwartz vehicle suddenly stopped in traffic was insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact. Therefore, the Supreme Court properly granted summary judgment to the defendants Schwartz, Diaz, and Rodriguez inasmuch as the evidence fails to show that they acted negligently (see, Bando-Twomey v. Richheimer, 229 A.D.2d 554; Barile v. Lazzarini, 222 A.D.2d 635).


Summaries of

Espinoza v. Diaz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 26, 2001
280 A.D.2d 639 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Espinoza v. Diaz

Case Details

Full title:TATIANA ESPINOZA, APPELLANT, v. OSCAR DIAZ, ET AL., RESPONDENTS

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 26, 2001

Citations

280 A.D.2d 639 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
720 N.Y.S.2d 841

Citing Cases

Succes v. Phillips

Nor is the "sudden stop" sufficient, as this is no defense where it occurs, as here, in slowing/heavy…

Momchilov v. Chaduhry

Accordingly, for purposes of the Wolvek defendants' instant summary judgment motion, the Court must determine…