From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Erwin v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Kansas
May 13, 2008
ACTION No. 07-1313 MLB (D. Kan. May. 13, 2008)

Summary

finding no error in ALJ's rejection of treating physician opinions which were "in direct contrast to the statements, at the same time, of function and improvement found in the treatment notes"

Summary of this case from Large v. Saul

Opinion

ACTION No. 07-1313 MLB.

May 13, 2008


ORDER


Ten days having passed, and no written objections being filed to the proposed findings and recommendations filed by the magistrate judge John Thomas Reid, and after a de novo determination upon the record pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. Rule 72(b), the court accepts the recommended decision and adopts it as its own.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Erwin v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Kansas
May 13, 2008
ACTION No. 07-1313 MLB (D. Kan. May. 13, 2008)

finding no error in ALJ's rejection of treating physician opinions which were "in direct contrast to the statements, at the same time, of function and improvement found in the treatment notes"

Summary of this case from Large v. Saul
Case details for

Erwin v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:JERRI D. ERWIN, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL…

Court:United States District Court, D. Kansas

Date published: May 13, 2008

Citations

ACTION No. 07-1313 MLB (D. Kan. May. 13, 2008)

Citing Cases

Large v. Saul

However, the ALJ was also permitted to consider the fact that Dr. Franco's notes, when viewed together,…