From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ertl v. Hodel

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Jul 23, 1987
663 F. Supp. 1126 (D. Colo. 1987)

Opinion

Civ. A. No. 86 F 764.

July 23, 1987.

William R. Roberts, Holme Roberts Owen, Denver, Colo., Donald L. Morgan, Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen Hamilton, Washington, D.C., for plaintiffs.

Gerald S. Fish, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., Richard J. Nolan, Asst. U.S. Atty., Janet L. Miller, Deputy Atty. Gen., Natural Resources Section, Denver, Colo., for defendant.


ORDER DISMISSING ACTION


This case involves claims and patents to oil shale deposits in Colorado. The legal principles underlying this litigation involve application of Tosco Corp. v. Hodel, 611 F. Supp. 1130 (D.Colo. 1985).

On March 6, 1987, before this case was at issue, the principal parties moved the Court to dismiss this complaint.

ACCORDINGLY, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that this complaint and cause of action be DISMISSED, each party to pay it or their own costs.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Ertl v. Hodel

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Jul 23, 1987
663 F. Supp. 1126 (D. Colo. 1987)
Case details for

Ertl v. Hodel

Case Details

Full title:Theo ERTL, Trustee, Theo Ertl and Joseph L. Fox, Trustees, Donald M…

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Jul 23, 1987

Citations

663 F. Supp. 1126 (D. Colo. 1987)

Citing Cases

Marathon Oil Co. v. Lujan

Although the case was settled while pending in United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, and…